Our Videos

October 4, 11

NEWS / Danfoss Group Subsidiary Agrees to Plead Guilty for Role in Price-Fixing Conspiracy Involving Refrig


Company Agrees to Pay $3 Million Criminal Fine

WASHINGTON — Danfoss Flensburg GmbH, formerly Danfoss Compressors GmbH, has agreed to plead guilty and to pay a $3 million criminal fine for its role in an international conspiracy to fix the prices of light commercial compressors, a type of refrigerant compressor used in devices such as water coolers and vending machines, the Department of Justice announced today.



According to a one-count felony charge filed today in U.S. District Court in Detroit, Danfoss Flensburg GmbH, a German subsidiary of the Danfoss Group, a Danish corporation, participated in a conspiracy to fix the prices of light commercial compressors sold in the United States and elsewhere from as early as Oct. 14, 2004, and continuing until about Sept. 6, 2007. According to the plea agreement, which is subject to court approval, Danfoss agreed to cooperate with the department’s ongoing refrigerant compressor investigation.



Refrigerant compressors take in low-pressure refrigerant, compress it and then pump out a high-pressure vapor, which condenses and subsequently cools devices such as water coolers and vending machines.



“The department’s investigation into the international conspiracy to fix the prices of refrigerant compressors is ongoing,” said Sharis A. Pozen, Acting Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “We are committed to ensuring open and fair competition in the refrigerant compressors market.”



According to the charge, Danfoss and co-conspirators carried out the conspiracy by agreeing during meetings and conversations to coordinate prices of light commercial compressors sold in the United States and elsewhere. As a part of the conspiracy, Danfoss and co-conspirators exchanged information on sales of light commercial compressors to monitor and enforce adherence to the agreed-upon prices.



Danfoss is charged with price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum $100 million fine for corporations. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.



Danfoss is the third company to be charged in the department’s investigation of the international conspiracy to fix the prices of refrigerant compressors. On Nov. 15, 2010, Panasonic Corporation pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine and on Dec. 16, 2010, Embraco North America Inc. pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine. In addition, on Sept. 27, 2011, three former executives – Ernesto Heinzelmann of Empresa Brasileira de Compressores S.A.; Gerson Verissimo of Tecumseh do Brasil Ltda.; and Naoki Adachi of Panasonic – were charged with participating in a conspiracy to coordinate price increases for refrigerant compressors to customers in the United States and elsewhere.



The department’s ongoing investigation into the worldwide refrigerant compressors market is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s Cleveland Field Office and the FBI’s Detroit Field Office, Ann Arbor, Resident Agency. Anyone with information concerning price fixing in the refrigerant compressor industry should call the Antitrust Division’s Cleveland Field Office at 216-687-8400 or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm.

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/October/11-at-1315.html

Tags: corporation,
 




Testimonials

AnnaMaria Realbuto
Thank you for all your assistance and efficiency...
Read More »
Kateryna Melnychenko
Thanks a lot Anton!...
Read More »
Rani Payne
Thank you so much! I’m sure I will be in touch again with something else that will need to be apost...
Read More »
Serge Bauer Law
Thank you again for your help with this case!...
Read More »



FAQ

What percentage interest in Partnership A’s profit, loss or capital is to be reported on Form 1065 Schedule B question 3a and 3b, under the following facts?
Read More »
Will I need to obtain a medical examination report?
Read More »
Can I send an unattached, completed acknowledgment certificate to a title company to correct an error?
Read More »
Q. Do I have to follow a hierarchy regarding the methods of service under Section 1608(b)?
Read More »






News

April 30, 24
OJ Simpson died from prostate cancer—death certificate
Read More »
April 24, 24
Tennessee Woman Receives Closure After Year-Long Battle Over Death Certificate
Read More »
April 17, 24
Illinois County Clerk dies; Cook County temporarily suspends issuing vital records
Read More »
April 12, 24
MI country scholarship program offers discounts for vital record retrieval
Read More »