Follow @USApostille
Our Videos |
June 3, 09
NEWS / Two Bay Area Residents Charged in Credit Card and Identity Theft SchemeSAN FRANCISCO—A federal grand jury indictment was unsealed Wednesday charging two Bay Area residents with the use of multiple false identifications and counterfeit credit cards, along with the possession of counterfeit document-making equipment, U.S. Attorney Joseph P. Russoniello announced. Jesse Carter, 36, and Cherie Hokamura, 36, each were charged in a 13-count indictment. The charges against the defendants include mail fraud, conspiracy, possession of document-making implements and device-making equipment, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, and aggravated identity theft. Hokamura was arraigned Wednesday; Carter was arraigned yesterday. The indictment alleges that Carter and Hokamura used false identification and counterfeit credit cards to fraudulently purchase goods and services, including the purchase of pre-paid debit cards funded by the counterfeit credit cards. The indictment further alleges that Carter and Hokamura possessed equipment to make fraudulent credit cards and to create false California driver’s licenses. Items of document-making equipment that the defendants were charged with possessing included a laminator, digital camera, black-light lamps, and four laptop computers. The indictment alleges that the defendants also possessed a spreadsheet containing 1,279 stolen credit or debit card numbers, and a book entitled, “Who Are You: The Encyclopedia of Personal Identification” for the purpose of carrying out the charged offenses. The maximum statutory penalty for each count of mail fraud is 20 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine, plus restitution if appropriate. The maximum penalty for the conspiracy count in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 is 5 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine, plus restitution if appropriate. The maximum statutory penalty for the possession of document-making implements and authentication features in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(5) is 15 years imprisonment, a $250,000 fine, plus restitution and forfeiture if appropriate. The maximum statutory penalty for the count of possessing device-making equipment in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(4) is 15 years imprisonment, a $250,000 fine, plus restitution and forfeiture if appropriate. The maximum statutory penalty for possessing 15 or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3) is 10 years imprisonment, a $250,000 fine, plus restitution and forfeiture if appropriate. Each count of aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(1) carries a mandatory two-year prison term to be served consecutive to any other prison term imposed, a fine of $250,000, and restitution and forfeiture if appropriate. Any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553. The case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys David Ward and Jeane Hamilton, with the assistance of Rosario Calderon. The prosecution is the result of a joint investigation by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, San Francisco Division; and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Sacramento Division. Please note, an indictment contains only allegations against an individual and, as with all defendants, Jesse Carter and Cherie Hokamura must be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. Further Information: Case #: 09-0444 CRB. Tags: document, |
Do you need
We do Retrieval, Preparation and Legalization.
Power of attorney
Vital records
Birth certificate
Marriage Certificate
Single Status Affidavit
No Record of a Marriage
Certificate of No Marriage Record
Divorce Certificate
Divorce Decree
Death certificate
Criminal Record
Certificate of good conduct
Criminal Background Check
Foreign Driver License
Documents for transportation of the Deceased
Children's Travel Consent Letter
Evaluation of Foreign Education Credentials for US
Letter of Invitation for USA Visa
Documents for Avoiding Double Taxation
|
TestimonialsNiranjan SujayI recently used LOGOS INTERNATIONAL for the translation of my bachelor’s certificate, and I couldn’t... Read More » Katia Nagata As a foreigner, I needed a certified translation, so I called the DOE to give me a list of the ce... |
FAQWhat Are Employers Allowed to Ask on a Job Application or in an Interview?Read More » World Freedom Day Read More » What must a student do after being granted the 17-month STEM extension? Read More » CAN STATES IN THE U.S. APPOINT COMMISSIONERS OF DEEDS TO PERFORM EXTRATERRITORIALLY NOTARIAL ACTS FOR USE IN THAT STATE? Read More » |
Quick Menuapostille Cayman Islandsapostille Namibia apostille Mongolia apostille Lebanon Certificate of Incorporation apostille Ireland apostille Pennsylvania apostille Hawaii apostille Chad apostille Illinois apostille Ecuador apostille Cook Islands apostille Wallis and Futuna apostille Israel apostille Bahamas, The apostille Canal Zone |
NewsDecember 18, 24NYC tax preparer accused of bilking IRS out of $145 million Read More » December 16, 24 Malaysian police verifying marriage certificate of couple whose baby was reportedly found in hospital freezer Read More » December 12, 24 Death certificate issue creates controversy in Daniel Penny trial Read More » December 9, 24 Philippine woman applies for No Record of Marriage certificate but receives Marriage Certificate instead Read More » |