Our Videos

November 27, 08

NEWS / RBC Mortgage Company Pays U.S. More Than $10.71 Million to Settle Allegations Involving Federally In


WASHINGTON – RBC Mortgage Company (RBC) has agreed to pay the United States more than $10.71 million to resolve allegations arising under the False Claims Act concerning 219 federally insured loans for mortgages submitted to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Justice Department announced today. The government alleged that, between 2001 and 2005, RBC, a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Canada, falsified documentation in support of loan applications, violated due diligence underwriting requirements and improperly submitted loans for endorsement by HUD that were not eligible for FHA insurance.

RBC, a publicly traded Canadian corporation, maintained offices located throughout the United States including Rockford, Ill. RBC was a pre-approved lender with "Direct Endorsement Authority" to originate and process FHA loans without waiting for prior review of the application by HUD. The FHA program and the direct endorsement process are designed to help low and moderate income families purchase homes by lowering some of the costs associated with mortgage loans.

As a pre-approved lender, RBC was responsible for conducting due diligence in underwriting the loans by verifying each borrower’s qualifications. The mortgage firm also was obligated to meet other requirements established by regulations or HUD program guidance. RBC has not originated a mortgage loan since September 2005.

The settlement reached between RBC and the United States resolves these allegations. In addition to its agreement to pay more than $10.71 million, RBC has also agreed to pay $264,000 to resolve administrative claims with respect to 39 federally insured loans.

This settlement was reached through the collaborative efforts of the U.S. Attorney’s office for Northern District of Illinois, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General and the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2008/November/08-civ-1051.html

Tags: document, corporation,
 




Testimonials

Niranjan Sujay
I recently used LOGOS INTERNATIONAL for the translation of my bachelor’s certificate, and I couldn’t...
Read More »
Katia Nagata

As a foreigner, I needed a certified translation, so I called the DOE to give me a list of the ce...
Read More »
AnnaMaria Realbuto
Thank you for all your assistance and efficiency...
Read More »
Kateryna Melnychenko
Thanks a lot Anton!...
Read More »




FAQ

If I want to sell my own work, do I need a license?
Read More »
How can I protect my invention, product or idea?
Read More »
For purposes of completing its 2008 Form 1065 Schedule B, questions 3 and 4, what percentage interest in profit, loss, or capital should Partnership P report for individual partners A and B, and corpo
Read More »
Q. What are the general exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign State?
Read More »






News

January 21, 25
US President Donald Trump scraps global corporate minimum tax deal
Read More »
January 15, 25
Living Indian man issued death certificate due to bureaucratic error
Read More »
January 14, 25
Japanese tennis star Naomi Osaka salvages daughter’s birth certificate from LA wildfires
Read More »
January 9, 25
US Congress mulls shift to residence-based taxation system
Read More »